Our daughter’s reaction was very positive and optimistic, on the verge of excitement. She was as stoked as an adolescent could possibly be. Immediately
she recognized that she would have the one-on-one attention that she
constantly craves but seldom has in the public school setting. She
did not say this in so many words, but she did mention the positives
about how she learned better from us than from the school. She also expressed excitement that her days would be more structured. When
we asked both kids whether they learned more at home or in school, and
if they understood more when taught at home, both answered in the
affirmative. Our daughter was
concerned about not having the school library, but when she was assured
that weekly trips to the public library would be scheduled she was OK
with it. She loves to read!
Our son’s reaction was one of a little more concern and deep contemplation. His
concern centered around the possibility that he would have more work to
do. Maximum benefit for minimum effort seems to be his implied
mantra. Another question which he asked was whether we would be going
on more than one field trip per year. He was excited to find out that
we will be planning many field trips. When we asked him if he was ever
truly challenged at school he replied that he wasn’t. Actually the conversation was more among the lines of, “do you ever find anything really difficult to understand at school?”. After a long pause his response was, “yes, swinging on the swing set. I can’t get it to go.”. We then asked if learning anything in the classroom was ever challenging. After another pause his response was, “no.”.
The bottom line is that the system teaches each kid to reach a minimum standard. The
ones that can reach that minimum standard are ignored, and in our son’s
case, expected to slow down and come back to the rest of the group. In our daughter’s case, she gets the minimum amount of attention needed to reach that minimum goal. As I have said before many times, public schooling teaches kids how to be mediocre.
We also need to reiterate, that we do not blame the teachers for this educational epidemic. We feel that teachers have their hands tied by the bureaucracy and the system for whom they work. They can seldom be teachers and rather have been forced to become administers of tests and indoctrination. Both of us are products of the public school system and find it unfortunate and appalling what the system has become.
We also need to reiterate, that we do not blame the teachers for this educational epidemic. We feel that teachers have their hands tied by the bureaucracy and the system for whom they work. They can seldom be teachers and rather have been forced to become administers of tests and indoctrination. Both of us are products of the public school system and find it unfortunate and appalling what the system has become.
No comments:
Post a Comment